tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22393096763544967062024-03-13T07:43:50.630-07:00The Door Is OpenWhat is the relationship between body, mind, spirit, creativity, beauty, world, ugliness, and the fear of spongecats?Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.comBlogger32125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-3803499418961443992016-07-02T22:40:00.003-07:002016-07-02T22:40:40.547-07:00I need a promptMostly I need a prompt to avoide doing what I need to do, which is editing my novel (s). Yes. Two of them. Unfinished and faceless like, oh, i don't know, some weird kind of organism made out of dough.<br />
<br />
Tempt me.<br />
<br />
Prompt me.<br />
<br />Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-64440785845540231462015-08-22T23:58:00.002-07:002015-08-22T23:58:46.550-07:00Cracked Flash Fiction - "The Seige" (my first blogspot post in eons)
<style type="text/css">p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; line-height: 120%; }</style>
<br />
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<b>Cracked Flash
Fiction</b></div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<b>The Seige<br />
300
words</b></div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<b>by Alana Dill</b></div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<b>@alanapaints on
Twitter &
Instagram<br />
</b><br />
_______________________________________________________________________</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<style type="text/css">p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; line-height: 120%; }</style>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
_______________________________________________________________________</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
“I hate it. I wish
it would stop.” Sarah watched through a chink in the second-floor
shutters. They'd barricaded the stairs. “Goats climb, right?”</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
On the bed, her
guide, Jeb, opened his eyes with effort. Smeared blood had glued his
lashes together. “Yeah.” The deer attack had left him woozy and
weak.
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
“We're surrounded.
Deer, raccoons... a <i>wolverine</i>?” She wondered if they could
climb the cabin's exterior walls.
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
“They can't climb
up to the second story.”</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
“Bears can.”</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
Jeb sighed. “They're already hibernating,” and sat up dizzily.
“Any food left?”
<br />
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
“Just a SlimJim
and a banana.” She turned to him. “How are we gonna get out of
this alive?”</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
“Someone will come
looking,” he said. Both doubted that.
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
•••</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
They'd awoken to
sudden, deep snow. A last few leaves had fallen atop the drifts,
leaving red-orange puddles on the white forest floor, like too-fresh
blood.
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
He'd opened the
SUV's hood to find an incinerated raccoon. It had chewed through the
battery cable. </div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br /></div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
The animals had
chased them back inside. <br />
•••
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
He said, “I
shouldn't have left the buck strapped to the roof overnight.”</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
“This isn't normal
animal behavior.”</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
“Nope.”</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
In the distance,
coyotes squealed, drawing closer. <br />
<br />
She shivered, “What
are we gonna do?”</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
“Can you climb up
to the roof? Write '<span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i><b>HELP</b></i></span></span>'
on it with kindling sticks?”</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
“The roof.”
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
“Yeah. Maybe a
passing small plane or helicopter...”<br />
<br />
“We're miles
from nowhere and there's another storm coming in.”</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
“So hurry.”
<br />
<br />
___<br />
<br />
Sarah climbed out the window onto the
porch roof, then climbed up on to the main roof. Jeb handed sticks up
to her. She was halfway through <span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><i><b>E</b></i></span></span>
when a distant rushing sound caught her ear. The black tree branches
swayed at their tips, swarming from every direction, a furry,
terrifying rumor approaching all around them. <br />
<br />
She
screamed.
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<i>Squirrels. </i>
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
<div style="line-height: 100%; margin-bottom: 0in;">
<br />
</div>
Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-6369032216378720052012-04-18T09:35:00.000-07:002012-04-18T09:37:07.980-07:00Sing it OutI think humans are born with an innate need to sing. Babies sing before they can talk. The last 100 years' generations in the modern world have sadly been brought up comparing themselves to the recorded voice, and it gets worse and worse as Autotune and synthesizers make the recorded voice superhuman. I have nothing against Annie Lennox manipulating her voice so we can hear the deliberate trick, but taking someone of mediocre talent and artificially turning them into someone with less mediocre talent... not so much. And I despise Simon Cowell and his ilk, who skewer vulnerable aspiring artists for fun... and teach those watching that it's ok to do so. It's not ok to shame someone for doing something they love.<br /><br />All over the world, throughout human history, people have sung together - around the fire or the table or at worship or in the tavern, at war and at peace. It bonds us, helps us express emotion otherwise inexpressable. Singing is so good for us, it ought to be written into the bill of rights.<br /><br />Not everyone can or should be a soloist, but everyone should be able to use their voice. Good for you that you help your boy conquer his fears!Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-14658106179142436032011-03-26T11:25:00.000-07:002011-03-26T11:29:49.862-07:00Individual human Growth vs Humanity as a WholeMichael L wrote:<br />>I think there has been a movement toward change, that the people can stand-up for themselves and fight for what they want, which essentially is to take back what has been stolen over the past 30 years. Obama inspired the youth in Cairo when he was there and, and look at how that inspiration has spread throughout the Muslim countries. This kicking-up of the right to continue to take all they can is their last-ditch effort and I think it is destined to work against them.<br /><br />I agree with this whole-heartedly. If we were to look at the history of humanity as a macrocosm, look at "man" as a person going through developmental stages, then it seems pretty clear. Compare the most primitive folks to "nasty, brutish and short" toddlerhood. 4-year-olds are sweet, crazy-fun, and very imaginative; 5-year-olds are starting to find their place in the world; 6 year olds fall into very striated social groups, girls vs boys, etc., and on and on. <br /><br />Our brains keep growing several years after legal adulthood; particularly the frontal lobe where decision making and recognition of consequences are regulated. I think that, down the line, someone is going to do research on what happens in the brain around age 27, when there's a subtle transition from youth to true adulthood, and not just in the waistline.<br /><br />I'm not sure what stage humanity is in, but it seems like we're around 18. We've gone through grade school, we've been soaked in hormones, we're beginning to scratch the surface of understanding consequences, we've had some losses and some triumphs which we can remember and put into perspective; we're looking at the stars and wondering how we'll change the world. Question is, does humanity as a whole want to make its first million before 30, or does it want to join the peace corps, or does it want to get married straight out of high school and open up an auto shop? And how will the internet and media connection worldwide foster this growth, a sense of connection in our worldwide personality which would parallel the integration of an adult's sense of self?<br /><br />Watching the news last night about Libya, I was struck by the mention of tribes being used against one another by Kadafi. Here in the Bay Area, I see a LOT of people obsessed with "tribe", and doing body art means a lot of exposure to tribal art and the permutations adapted/adopted by these folks. It's easy to romanticize the noble tribal archetype, but truth is that tribalism can be a trap. I'm charmed by cultural practices as they relate to art, and can see how survival would have dictated such things as ritual circumcision and scarification and food laws. I think we developed tribalism to evenly distribute resources without any one area being too pressured and depleted. It works well in a hunter-gatherer situation. It doesn't work so well when anything more advanced than a spear becomes available to do harm.<br /><br />America has its own tribalism going on. Elephants and donkeys, red states and blue states (isn't it hilarious how the reds used to be communists, then republican states became red, now Wisconsin's labor movement colors are red and white? Dang, we need a new color!) The totemism of our ancestors is still seen in the iconography of our marketing.<br /><br />Maybe we who wish to move forward and make the world a fairer place should be green dragons, or purple lions, or orange lotuses. I don't know. I sure wouldn't want my affiliations symbolized by a used-up tea bag.Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-23784188478443848402010-08-25T20:47:00.000-07:002010-08-25T20:57:05.914-07:00Ending for Mark Twain's story, A Stranger in ViennaThe contest is over; I wrote an ending but never submitted it because heck, I needed way more than 300 words, which would barely have done justice to many of Twain's better paragraphs. In my sheer verbosity, I disqualified my little filly before she even left the gate.<br /><br />(By the way, I have never smoked a cigar nor drunk single-malt whiskey, but I understand a good deal about the nature of temptation and longing; the rest is merely chemistry.)<span style="font-size:130%;"><b><br />Conversations with Satan<br />(the first part, by Mark Twain)</b> </span><div style="font-family:Times New Roman;"><div><div><div><div><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> IT WAS being whispered around that Satan was in Vienna incognito, and the thought came into my mind that it would be a great happiness to me if I could have the privilege of interviewing him. “When you think of the Devil” he appears, you know. It was past midnight, I was standing at the window of my work-room high aloft on the third floor of the hotel, and was looking down upon a stage-setting which is always effective and impressive at that late hour: the great vacant stone-paved square of the Morzin Platz with its sleeping file of cab-horses and drivers counterfeiting the stillness and solemnity of death; and beyond the square a broad Milky Way of innumerable lamps bending around the far-reaching curve of the Donau canal, with not a suggestion of life or motion visible anywhere under that glinting belt from end to end. If the square and the curve were dim or dark, the impressiveness would be wanting; but the multitudinous lights seem to belong properly with life and energy and the roar and tumult of traffic, and these being now wholly absent, the resulting impression conveyed to the spirit is that they have been suddenly and mysteriously annihilated, and that this brooding midnight silence and solemnity are the signs and symbols of the tragedy that has happened. </span></p><p align="left"><br /></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;">Now, with a most strange suddenness came an inky darkness, with a stormy rush of wind, a crash of thunder and a glare of lightning; and the glare vividly revealed the figure of a slender and shapely gentleman in black coming leisurely across the empty square. By his dress he was an Anglican Bishop; but I noticed that he cast a shadow. That gave him away, as Goethe phrases it; for by the ministrations of lightning no legitimate Anglican Bishop can do that-nor can any other earth-born creature, for that matter. This person was Satan. I knew it. It was in his honor that the sudden storm had been summoned and its thunders delivered in salute. It was inspiring, it was uplifting, this sublime ceremonial. If I had been a monarch it would have spoiled, for one while, my satisfaction in my little artillery salutes. And yet I would have tried to be properly philosophical, and ease and content myself with the reflection that the honors had been fairly and justly proportioned to the difference existing between Satan’s importance and mine, I being but a passing and evanescent master of a limited patch of empire, and he the long-term master of the majority of the human race. </span></p><p align="left"><br /></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;">I had that glimpse of Satan and his shadow, and the next moment he was by my side in the room. He did not embarrass me. Real royalties do not embarrass one; they are sure of their place, sure of its recognition; and so they bear about with them an alpine serenity and reposefulness which quiet the nerves of the spectator. It is the prerogative of a viscount or a baron to make a person feel small, and of a baronet to extinguish him. Satan would not allow me to take his hat, but put it on the table himself, and begged me not to put myself to any trouble about him, but treat him just as I would an old friend; and added that that was what he was-an old friend of mine, and also one of my most ardent and grateful admirers. It seemed a doubtful compliment; still, it was said in such a winning and gracious way that I could not help feeling gratified and proud. His carriage and manners were enviably fine and courtly, and he was a handsome person, with delicate white hands and an intellectual face and that subtle air of distinction which goes with ancient blood and high lineage, commanding position and habitual intercourse with the choicest society. The usual portraits of him are but resemblances, nothing more. They are very inaccurate. None of them is recent. The latest is as much as three hundred years old. They were all made by monks, and from memory; for the monks did not tarry. The monk was always excited, and he put his excitement into the picture. He thus conveyed an error, for Satan is a calm person; aristocratically calm and self-possessed. Satan’s face is notably intellectual, and fine, and expressive. It suggests Don Quixotte’s, and also Richelieu’s, but it is not so melancholy as the one nor so austere as the other; and neither of those grand faces has the winning quality which is the immortal charm and grace of Satan’s. </span></p><p align="left"><br /></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;">In Germany the sofa is the seat of honor and is always offered to the guest. It may be so in Austria also, therefore I tendered it to Satan, and called him by the loftiest titles I could think of-<i>Durchlauschtigst, </i>and <i>Ihro Majestät</i>-but he declined it, saying he would have no ceremony, and so took a chair. He said- </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “You are very comfortable here. The German stove is the best in the universe.” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “I agree to that, with all my heart, Durchlauscht. That one there is eleven feet high and four feet square, and looks like a graveyard monument built of white tiles; but its looks are its only blemish. At eight in the morning it burns up one small basketful of wood in twenty minutes, and that is all it requires for the day. This great room will keep the same level and pleasant and comfortable degree of warmth hour after hour without change, and there is no artificial heat in the world that is comparable to it for wholesomeness, healthfulness. It does not inflame the skin, it does not oppress the head or make the temples throb; there isn’t a headache in a hundred years of it. As for economy, it is a good ten times more economical than any other house-heating apparatus known to the world.” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “You use it in America, of course?” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> I was pleasantly surprised at that, and said- </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “Is it possible that Ihro Majestät is not familiar with America?” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “Well-no. I have not been there lately. I am not needed there.” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> At first I was gratified; but next I was suspicious that maybe his remark did not quite mean what I had thought it meant; so it seemed good diplomacy not to stir the matter, but leave it alone and go on about the stove again. </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “No,” I said, “we don’t use the German stove in America. We have the name of being the most ingenious of the nations in the matter of inventing and putting to practical use all manner of conveniences, comforts, and labor-saving and money-saving contrivances, and we have fairly earned that name and are proud of it; but we do not know how to heat a house rationally, yet, and it seems likely that we shall never learn. The most of our stoves are extravagant wasters of fuel; the most of them require frequent attention and recharging; none of them furnishes a continuously equable heat, and we have not one that does not scorch the skin and oppress the head. We have spent tons and tons of money upon furnaces with elaborate and costly arrangements for distributing dry heat or steam or hot water throughout a house; but they are all ravenous coal-cannibals, and if there is one among them whose heat-output can be successfully regulated I have not seen it. As far as my knowledge goes, we have none but insane ways of heating houses and railway cars in America.” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “Then why don’t you introduce the German stove?” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “I wish I could. I could save the country money enough annually to pay the silly pension bill. And if we had that admirable stove we should soon find a way to rid it of its grim and ghostly look and make it a pretty and graceful thing to look at, and an ornament to the room; for we are a capable people in those directions. But I suppose we shall never see the day. The Americans who come over here do not study the German stove, they merely make fun of its personal appearance, and go away without finding out what a competent and inexpensive miracle it is. The Berlin stove is the best that I have seen. When we kept house there several winters ago we charged our parlor monument at 7 in the morning with a peck of cheap briquettes made of refuse coal-dust, let the fire burn half an hour, then shut up the stove and never touched it again for twenty-four hours. All day long and up to past midnight that room was perfectly comfortable, not too hot, not too cold, and the heat not varying, but remaining at the same pleasant level all the time. Do you like the German stove, Durchlauscht?” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “Not for my boarders-no.” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “What do you use, Durchlauscht?” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> He named sixty-four varieties of stoves and house-furnaces. Dear me, those old familiar names-they were all American! But I didn’t say anything. I was ashamed; and yet at the same time I was conscious of a private little thrill of patriotic pride in the reflection that in a humble way we had been able to add a discomfort to hell. </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Of course we were smoking, all this time, for Durchlauscht has had experience of the chief joy of man for many ages. The early American Indians introduced it in Sheol twenty or thirty thousand years ago, and out of gratitude he is never severe on that race. I thought I would venture to indicate in an unobtrusive way that by rights I was an Indian, though changed in the cradle through no fault of mine-and waited timorously for a comment. But I was disappointed. He only looked. It may be that he did not mean anything by the look, but often a look like that is discouraging, anyway, if you are conscious yourself that you have been trying to pull a person’s leg, as the saying is. In such cases you let on that you did not know you had said anything; and it is the best way, and soonest over. </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Then you change the subject; and I did. I asked him to try the Navy Cut, and I loaded his pipe with it and gave him a light. He liked it. I was sure he would. He sent up a cloud of fragrant smoke, and said admiringly- </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “It is good; very, very good; burns freely and smells like a heretic.” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> That made me shudder a little, but that was nothing; we all have our metaphors, symbols, figures of speech, and they vary according to habitat, environment, taste, training, and so on. </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “Where do you get this tobacco?” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “In London, Durchlauscht.” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “But where in Vienna?” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “It is a pity to have to say it, but one can’t get it in Vienna at all.” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “You must be mistaken about that. You must remember that this is one of the most superb cities that was ever built; and is very rich, and very fond of good things, and can command the best of everything that the world can furnish; and it also has the disposition to do it. This is my favorite city. I was its patron saint in the early times before the reorganization of things, and I still have much influence here, and am greatly respected. When you intimate that there is anything of first excellence which one cannot get in Vienna, you hurt my feelings. You would not wish to hurt my feelings?” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> “I? Indeed, no. Do not look at me like that, Durchlauscht; you break my heart. But what I have said is really the truth. Consider what this noble city smokes-latakia! It is true, just as I say. It smokes latakia, and fine-cut Turkish and Syrian ordure that burns your tongue and makes a mephitic odor which suffocates.” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> We are a vain and thoughtless race. In criticising in this large and arrogant way other people’s tastes in the matter of tobacco I was satirizing myself, without for the moment being conscious of it. For it has been my habit to look down in a superior way upon persons who were so low in the scale of intelligence as to believe such a thing possible as the establishing of a <i>standard </i>of excellence in tobacco and cigars. Tastes in this matter seem to be infinite. Each man seems to have a standard of his own, and he also seems to be ashamed of the next man’s taste and hostile to his standard. I think that no one’s standard is steadfast, but is at all times open to change. When we travel, and are obliged to go without our favorite brand and take up with the cigar of the country we chance to be in, we presently find ourselves establishing <i>that </i>cigar as our standard. In Venice we are at first too good to smoke those cheap black rat-tail “Virginias” that have a straw through them, but a fortnight’s familiarity with them changes all that and we adopt the Virginia as our standard. In Florence and Rome we are sorry for a people who are condemned to smoke the cheap menghettis and trabucos, but soon we prefer them to any other cigars. In Germany, France and Switzerland we take less kindly to the native cigars; but in India we quickly come to believe that the Madras two-cent cigar is much better than the Cuban cigar which costs twenty cents in New York. I must not claim to speak fairly and justly about high-priced cigars, for I have never bought any myself, and have not smoked other people’s when I could substitute a cheap one of my own without being discovered; for to my mind there is no cigar that is quite so vile and stenchy and inflammable as a twenty-cent Havana. This is probably a superstition; for I am well satisfied that all notions, of whatever sort, concerning cigars, are superstitions-superstitions and stupidities, and nothing else. It distresses me to hear an otherwise sane man talk about “good” cigars, and pretend to know what a good cigar is-as if by any chance his standard could be a standard for anybody else. </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> We have all noticed this-and it tells its own story: that when we go out to dine at another man’s house, we privately carry along a handful of cigars as a protection. We know that the chances are that his standard and ours will differ. We take his cigar, but we manage a substitution furtively. From long habit-backed by prejudice and superstition-I dread those high-priced Havanas with a fancy label around them; a label which costs the hundredth part of a cent, and augments the price of the cigar twenty-seven degrees beyond its value. I have accepted tons of those; and given them to the poor. It is not that I hate the poor, for I do not; but only because I cannot bring myself to waste anything, even a fancy-labeled execrable cigar. </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Not more than two persons in eight hundred thousand know even their own cigars when they are outside of the box; they think they do, but that is another superstition. Years ago several friends of mine used to come to my house every Friday night to play billiards. They patiently smoked my cheap cigars and never said a wounding word about them. With one exception. That was a gentleman who thought he knew all about cigars, and whose opinion was like the rest of the world’s-not valuable. He had a high-priced brand of his own, and he did not like my cheap weeds. He tried to smoke them, but he growled all the time, and always threw the cigar away after a few whiffs, and tried another and another and another. He did that all one winter. The truth was, that they were his own cigars, not mine. By request, his wife sent me a couple of dozen every Friday afternoon. He may not believe this when he sees it in print, but the other witnesses are there yet, and they will confirm the truth of my statement. </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> And I have another case. One winter, along in those years, I heard that the “long nine” of fifty years ago was being manufactured and marketed again, and I was glad, for I had smoked them when I was a lad of nine or ten and knew that twelve or fifteen of them could be depended upon to make a day pass pleasantly at light cost. I sent to Wheeling and laid in a supply, at 27 cents a barrel. They were delightful. But their personal appearance was distinctly against them; and besides they came in boxes that were not attractive; boxes that held a hundred each and were made of coarse blue pasteboard; boxes that were crazy, and battered, and caved in, and ugly and vulgar and plebian, and looked like the nation. Just the aspect of the box itself would make anybody sea-sick but me; with the burnt-rag aspect of its homely contents added, the result was truly formidable. </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> I could not venture to offer these things, undisguised, to my friends, for I had no desire to be shot; so I put fancy labels around a lot of them, and kept them in a polished mahogany box with a perforated false bottom that had a damp sponge under it; and gave them a large Spanish name which nobody could spell but myself and no ignorant person could pronounce; and said that these cigars were a present to me from the Captain General of Cuba, and were not procurable for money at any price. These simple devices were successful. My friends contemplated the long nines with the deepest reverence, and smoked them the whole evening in an ecstasy of happiness, and went away grateful to me and with their souls steeped in a sacred joy. </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> I carried the experiment no further, but dropped it there. A year later these same men were at my house to discuss a topic of some sort-for it was a social club, and its members met fortnightly at each other’s houses in the winter time, and discussed questions of the day, and finished with a late supper and much smoking. This time, in the midst of the supper, the colored waiter came to me, looking as pale as amber, and whispered and said he had forgotten to provide proper cigars, and there was no substitute in the house but the vulgar long nines in the blue pasteboard boxes-what should he do? I said pass them around and say nothing-we could not help ourselves at this late hour. He passed them. </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> It was usual for these people to smoke and talk an hour and a half. But this time they did not do that. They looked at the battered blue box dubiously, and in turn took out a long nine hesitatingly, and lit it. Then an uncanny silence fell upon the company; conversation died. Then, after five minutes, a man excused himself and left-had an engagement, he said. In a couple of minutes, another man lied himself out. Within ten minutes the whole twelve were gone and I was alone; and it was not yet eleven o’clock. </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> In the morning at breakfast the colored man asked me how far it was from the front door to the upper gate. I said it was a hundred and twenty-five feet. Then he said, impressively, “Well, sir, you can walk the whole way, and step on a long nine every time.” </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> What an exposure of human nature it is. Those were the same cigars that had lifted those people into heaven a year before. They had smoked all their lives, yet they knew nothing about cigars. The only way that they could tell a fine cigar from a poor one was by the label and the box; and the great majority of men are just like them. The wine merchant and the cigar dealer have an easy chance to get rich, for it is merely a matter of knowing how to select the right labels. </span></p><p align="left"><span style="font-size:130%;"> In the continental States, tobacco is a government monopoly, and the tobacco used is native-almost altogether. In Vienna there is but one shop where importations can be had. But it keeps no endurable brands of English or American smoking tobacco. When I speak of English tobacco I mean American tobacco manufactured in England. America has many brands of good smoking tobacco; and could have good and cheap native cigars, I suppose. In fact we had good native cigars fifteen years ago, but none now, so far as I know. I am not hard to please, but to my mind the American native cigar is easily the worst in the world-and it costs from seven to ten cents, too. The trabuco cigar, furnished by the Austrian government, suits my taste exactly, comes up to my strictest standard, and even a little above it; and it costs just 40 cents a hundred. The best native American cigar cannot compare with it. Perhaps it is our high protection that has degraded our tobacco. There being no foreign competition, we can compel ninety-nine Americans in the hundred to smoke any rubbish we please, since he cannot afford the imported article; and as a result we are the only considerable nation in the world which smokes supremely villainous cigars. </span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;"> Possibly my approval of the Austrian cigar pays it but a doubtful compliment, but I do not think so. For I am one of the sixteen men now alive in the world who estimate a cigar by its personal qualities, not by its name and its price. </span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;"> *** </span></p><p><span style="font-size:130%;"> <span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;">here ends Twain's writing. I propose to finish it thusly:</span><br /><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"> ***</span><br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> I had paused for a moment. lost in a reverie about cigars and the nature of man. Durchlauscht leaned back on the couch, and his calm gaze swept the view of my window. He said quietly, "From this perspective, this courtyard could be anywhere in the civilized world. Is it not remarkable, how much of the truth can be revealed or concealed simply by a trick of light or dark? He smiled and took a long draught from his pipe, held it out judiciously at arm's length, and smiled wryly. He cleared his throat, very softly. Ah! the sound of a thirsty man. I was forgetting my manners! I jumped up and went to the mahogany sideboard.<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> "Would you care for some libation? I have water, and a whiskey that I bought on my travels last year."<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> He smiled, his dark eyes glittering slightly. "Thank you - no water for me, but I should like some whiskey very much. You are very kind." I poured two small cut-crystal glasses from the decanter. I noticed again that I felt no sense of nervousness; my hands did not shake, nor did my mouth feel dry. He was indeed an unassuming and comfortable companion, and I was greatly relishing our visit.<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> I handed him his glass, sat down with mine and took a sip. Its warm, velvety taste complimented my Austrian cigar perfectly; I presumed that my guest would equally appreciate the marriage of his whisky with the smoke from his dying pipe. I said "I greatly enjoyed visiting this distillery and purchased two cases; one for travel, one sent directly home. It was a most gratifying excursion. What is your impression of Scotland?"<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> He smiled. "It is a beautiful country. Aside from their execrable cooking and their peculiar treatment of ferrets, its people give me little to do. The Scots are frequently stubborn but not prideful; they are parsimonious but not acquisitive. I find it much easier and more profitable to work with the English."<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> He raised the glass to his lips and sniffed deeply. Pleasure spread over his face like dawn over a new day. He was indeed a handsome and agreeable man, appreciative of the truly finer things. "I detect just a trace of smoke, a touch of heather honey, and fine oak tannins." He closed his eyes a moment, as if he wanted to shut out sight to give the whiskey a greater benefit of smell and taste. He raised the glass to his lips, tilted his head back, and the whiskey ignited with a white flash, like a tiny bomb. I had a hellish vision as he swallowed the flaming beverage; the skin on his face for just a moment blackened then peeled away to reveal a death-mask of rotting flesh, bone, and exposed bloodshot eyeballs; the black beard, moustache and eyebrows became crawling worms of red flame; the elegant white hand holding the glass burned briefly into a grasping, charcoal claw. The glass made a soft tinkling noise, like the sound of a hummingbird egg breaking.<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> In my astonishment, I shrank back in my chair, dropped my cigar, and my own whiskey sloshed out of its glass. "Good God, man!" I cried from sheer shock, then panicked as I realized I had probably said the most offensive thing possible to my esteemed guest, whose ghastly visage seemed to be reassembling itself. I could only hope that, in the aftermath of the conflagration, he did not hear my outburst. I set down my glass, scrambled about to find my cigar stub, and when I had recovered it from the carpet, rose unsteadily to my feet. My guest's appearance had almost returned to its cool, composed semblance of healthy perfection - except for wisps of smoke trailing from his ears and nostrils, and a certain ashiness clinging to his facial hair. He did not seem at all affronted by my reflexive invocation of the Almighty, but rather smiled in blissful gratitude for the whisky and sighed happily. He sniffed at the empty glass once again, and when he set it delicatedly on the tray with his undamaged hand, I saw that the crystal was feathered with a thousand tiny cracks, hazed with smoke on the inside, and the delicate rim that had touched his mouth was slumped and melted like candle wax.<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Like a true gentleman, he kept his eyes averted from me while I regained my composure, gazing once again at the view out the window with a relaxed and genial air. I went to the water pitcher, sloshed mightily as I tried to pour water with trembling hands, and gulped it down, then poured myself another which I also hastily consumed. When Satan next spoke, his voice was raspy and dry, as if his tongue was a dry leaf, and the breath wheezed in his burned lungs. "Ah. Highlands single malt. Aged - 16 years? No. Twenty." His voice cleared. "I see that you truly are a man of discernment, Mr. Twain." He took out a handkerchief and dabbed delicately at his face. Although the ash disappeared, the kerchief remained spotless. He wiped his hand of remaining ash too, and tucked the kerchief away. </span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Thus back to normal, he said, "Sir, I shall be taking my leave of you shortly - unfortunately I have other obligations. There are several parties tonight and a short meeting which all require my brief attendance. It would have been delightful to have had a longer chat. Would you care for another smoke before I go?"<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Then he put away his own pipe, took out a small pocket humidor, sized to carry two cigars. The humidor had a slightly singed look to it, and I noticed a reddish gleam of dying ember along the eges. Durchlauscht smiled at me and opened the box with a flourish. I must confess I shrank back a little in fear, not knowing whether to expect cinders, cigars, or an imp to grab me by the nose, shrink me down, and haul me into Hell through this magic box.<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> When opened, the humidor revealed a scene of beauty inside. It was lined with crimson satin, and nestled therein were twin expertly-rolled cigars of moderate size, banded simply and tastefully without pretense, marked with a simple five-pointed star. An aroma wafted out from these cigars, and I was stricken by its complexity - the faintest floral scent of the nicotiana flower, a whiff of innocent childhood and a pinch of eager harlot, the richness, the sharpness, the depth, the mild sweetness, the promise of a smoke that would transport me to a height of pleasure I'd never before imagined. And yet something else was woven into that scent... the barest underlying hint of brimstone, and the memory of a Mississippi funeral parlor's smell on a hot Saturday afternoon, just after the coffin has left the building. But I must confess, that bitter deathly tang somehow made the brilliant qualities of those cigars even more alluring. The only missing component was smoke to complete and release perfection. Unsmoked, I could have steeped myself in that aroma for a century. Alight, and imparting all its charms to me, this would be the smoke beside which anything else would be swamp gas by comparison.<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> My hand, almost of its own accord, began to reach out for one. I could barely take my eyes off its velvety, brown, papery, delicious beauty. It was the dry chrysalis from which the butterfly of my future would spring, fully formed, and fly. My fingers trembled. And then I noticed that Durchlaucht's fingers trembled slightly too. My hand stopped in mid air, and I looked up at his face. I just caught the fleeting end of an expression of ineffable greed and triiumph, as if he had gambled away a goat and won a thoroughbred. I had a sensation of ice water poured down my back even as he instantly cloaked his desire with that air of gracious and easy civility. I blinked. Oh, that scent, that... heavenly, hellish scent. I wanted to inhale it all in, set the fire that would make it part and parcel of my lungs and being. The smoke would imbue me and cloak me; it would make me the greatest writer that ever lived; my entire family would live in health and happiness; all doors would be open to me; I would have the key to every great city in America and on the continent. And yet I knew that to light the match now would be to sell myself more completely than any signature, handshake, or seal ever could. And this compact would make all that I chose to do, all my success, dependent upon it. The old book says that pride generally goeth before a fall - however, greed's generally the boot that kicks pride over the edge. It would be easy to allow both pride and greed to have the upper hand, but the easiest route does not always lead to the best destination. Being a typical specimen of the human race and the American race in particular, my pride in independence fought valiantly in my heart with greed for security, and won. Perhaps for the first time, immodesty and pride actually served me well; I was not about to share the credit for my work with anyone, no matter how illustrious. My words and scribblings might be barely distiguishable from the Devil's, and some may suspect that he inspires many of them, but they are indeed my own, and they remain my own even now.<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> "I think" I said, "That, ah, perhaps I have had enough smoking for now." My words, which usually come easily, dragged protesting out of my mouth like a possum fighting extrication from a tree.<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Durchlauscht smiled easily, with no trace of dismay. "Oh, but my dear Mr. Clemens, I insist! I know you can easily smoke one more tonight, and I shall keep you company. You have been a most gracious host, invited me in, shared your spirits with me. It is only fitting that together we enjoy this small token of my friendship and esteem. Can you not smell this? It was hand rolled in my homeland with great care and at great cost, although it is modest compared to the respect in which I hold you and your writings, which I am sure will become even more widely read and lucrative than their current happy state." He plucked a cigar from its little coffin and held it closer to my nose, waving it gracefully back and forth. I noticed the absence of tobacco stains on his nails, which were very clean and white, neatly manicured. My eyes watered as they followed the slowly waving cigar, and a miasma of longing formed about me, swaying my will, body and soul.<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> With great effort I shook my head, and my voice shook as well. "My dear Durchlaught, I deeply appreciate your very kind offer. WIth the greatest of due respect, and meaning no insult, I am indisposed to smoking any further tonight." With mixed emotions of longing, dread, regret, and firm resolution, I bowed. "Perhaps when we meet again, as I am sure we will." </span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Durchlaght hid a flicker of anger, then smiled coolly, replaced the cigar, closed the humidor, and proffered it to me. "I understand. Then please, if you are disinclined tonight, keep this as a remembrance, with my highest regards" </span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Knowing better than to displease him further, I accepted the box, which was surprisingly heavy - as if lined with lead - and still hot as blazes. I suddenly noticed that the humidor's ebony lid was inlaid with the initials "SC" in blood red wood. My fingers sizzling slightly, I hastily set the thermidor on the table next to the cracked glass where they both sat, fuming slightly.<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> "Thank you for the cigars, sir, and for granting this interview. It has been an intriguing evening. I assume the time will be short before we continue our acquaintance."<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Durchlaght put on his coat, then his hat, which he tipped to me elegantly, once again the picture of kindness and good manners. "Thank you again for your excellent hospitality. I eagerly anticipate that we will soon converse together again - over whiskey and a smoke". He waggled his eyebrows playfully.<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Speechless, I nodded and stretched my lips into the semblance of an affable smile. We shook hands, and somewhat to my surprise, his handshake was not unusual in any way. It was firm and smooth, of a moderate temperature, with no sign of the deathly claw that had caused me such distress only a short time before. Satan vanished with a brief flash and burst of whirling black wind; the curtains rose and flapped wildly then fell back to rest. </span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> I staggered over to the table and leaned on it, breathing heavily as if I had run a race, and stared. The whisky glass, which had been so severely damaged, was once again sparkling and perfect, each ornate cut reflecting the gaslight. There was no burn-hole in the carpet from my dropped cigar. Only the slight blisters on my fingers, and the still-hot humidor, testified to the presence and nature of my visitor.<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> I thought about opening the humidor, taking out a cigar, and smelling it again, then putting it back. I contemplated smoking a cigar immediately, calling old Scratch back to share and enjoy the moment for all it was worth, damning myself - or at least damning mysef further and more efficiently. I could not give it away to someone blameless and ruin them; I could not give it to a scoundrel who had already set his own course to hell; I could not leave it in a dustbin or drop it in the ocean for dread of poisoning the life of any scavenging innocent who chanced upon it. I thought about incinerating the source of my temptation in the German stove - but I suspect that destroying the humidor would require greater heat than any normal stove could produce - even of the myriad infernal American types. In the end, there was nothing for it but to keep the cigars in their humidor until the appropriate occasion arose. The humidor cooled off by the next morning, and has been with me ever since, although I occasionally leave it at home when on short trips. On longer journeys it is tucked away at the bottom of my valise, always awaiting the day when I feel ready to stop postponing the inevitable. I hear tell that Halley's Comet, which flew over on the day of my birth, will be making another appearance on my 75th birthday. I think I shall ride out on its coattails, trailing a puff of the finest smoke the world has ever known.<br /></span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> *** </span></p><p style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"><span style="font-size:130%;"> Alana Guy Dill </span></p>originally written 4/21/09<br /></div></div></div></div></div>Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-36133594034145322372010-06-28T09:42:00.000-07:002010-06-28T09:43:35.598-07:00Musings on my 49th birthdayI've never been that good at math, but Lewis Black has it only partly right. Anyone who's glanced at women's magazines knows that 16 is the new 25, 27 is the new 21, 30 is the new 20, 40 is the new 30, and 45 is still unequivocally frickin' 45. Fortunately, I don't have to jump to 55 till I turn 65, and since 100 is the new 85, I figure I have another good 75 years left in me, the last 50 of which will probably be in a van down by the river. God willin' and the creek don't rise. Since the creek is, according to experts, definitely going to rise, I presume the river will be somewhere 28 feet higher than where I am now, at sea level. <br /><br />Although I am a natural optimist, a cynical outburst once in a while keeps me from feeling like a complete idiot when I'm wrong.<br /><br />I guess that, since I need to head for them thar hills, in the hope that someday I will become over them, I should celebrate my 49th year by mining for gold. By that I do not mean picking my nose. But I need to do some serious earning this year, of both money and mojo.Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-85291273769819347192010-05-03T10:21:00.000-07:002010-05-03T10:24:27.876-07:00The Shape of a Mother - link to their websitehttp://theshapeofamother.com/<br /><br />for some reason when I tried to add the link before, it ended up being embedded in the post title. That's not so helpful if there's no indication to the reader that it's available.<br /><br />I have to say I'm not completely crazy about Blogger. I don't seem to have an option to edit a previous post. The templates are sort of ugly. My photos don't seem to stay attached to the post, so if i don't add new photos to the queue, an old photo stays at the top with the newer post.<br /><br />I might switch my blog to another host. Does anyone have a blog host they totally love?Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-19519154872423789632010-04-21T18:03:00.000-07:002010-04-21T18:20:14.421-07:00The Shape of A Mother - my belly and meThis may not be of interest to all, but to those of us who bear the signs of our amazing feat of bringing another human being into the world, this is for you... note site has some nudity and is not "day job" friendly.<br /> ***<br /> I once saw an amazing art exhibit where women allowed portrait photographers to do post-mastectomy portraits. It was so deeply touching, heartbreaking and filled me with admiration at the self-acceptance and strength these women had developed. I know a few women who've had tattoos done to embellish surgery scars. I've seen heads purposely shaved and decorated with henna, that once would have been hidden under itchy wigs and hats. And here in this web site, women are beginning to get over shame about their postpartum bodies and celebrate the gift of motherhood physically as well as emotionally. I've often wondered whether I was the only one who wanted to be proud of my post-baby stretched out self, and now it appears I'm not the only one who feels there's hope that someday we'll appreciate the beauty of what we have borne.<br /><br /> Since I've had periods of obesity and lifelong binge-or-starve cycles, been through a couple of pregnancies, have a short torso that got stretched unbelievably big, and carry about 50 extra pounds, I have very mixed feelings about my own body. Even at my tiniest, with 4-day-a-week workouts, no sugar, and a very physical job as a waitress, I had a 28" waist and small hips. So I've never had that desirable hourglass figure I've longed for. Pregnancy really changed me both physically and emotionally. I carried our first baby (Bryce) almost to term, then he died in utero at 8 months gestation, and was stillborn a few days later. His death shattered me, and the emptiness of my sagging tummy was a cruel reminder of everything we'd lost for a very long time. My second baby, the lovely and precious Evelyn, stretched me out even more (I'm 5'3", she was almost 10 lbs at birth). I was so proud of my lovely pregnant tummy and after she was safely born, I was so glad to have her with me I really didn't mind the residual evidence of my fecundity. On the other hand, I have to say that my least favorite preschool book was "The Saggy, Baggy Elephant". My belly is still quite big - I am clinically obese and wear size 40 waist pants (plus I don't have much of a butt - I'm barrel shaped). She's now 11 years old, and I haven't been able to pull my waist back together (had some muscle separation, too). In spite of myself, I feel so much shame about its deflated and wobbly postpartum state. But sometimes I look at this tummy and these thighs and KNOW how grateful I am that they were able to carry us safely through. Back cleavage... I can't summon up gratitude for that. And I'm really scared that if I lose weight, my breasts will deflate and hang as flat as pancakes. I nurse almost 4 years, and although they seem pretty firm now, I don't know how they'll react to a loss of volume.<br /><br />20 years ago few people were painting pregnant tummies; they were hidden. I'm still not sure about flaunting them in public on city streets, but I think showing them off in controlled circumstances is wonderful (and I realize that some may not agree with me - I'm not trying to pick a fight with them, it's just how I feel and I may not be as conservative as some).<br /><br /> I wonder if the day will come when a post-partum mom asks me to paint the soft skin of the belly that carried her baby. If I'm asked, I know that technically it won't be easy, but it will be a wonderful experience.Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-69745014766168566422010-03-23T19:24:00.000-07:002010-03-23T19:36:10.804-07:00Silly cartoon for art nerds: Et in Arcadia EggoIf you know this painting by Poisson, (yes that means "Fish" in French), you know its name is Et in Arcadia Ego. See, these naive shepherds in paradise have stumbled across a tomb, and are trying to figure out what it is for. Wow, dude, somebody died? whoa.<br /><br />I first saw this painting in college - looking back at my transcript I'm just amazed I got a c in art history, because I loved it and remember much of the information - but I think I slept through a few pop quizzes. At home, not in the classroom. Kids: don't do drugs.<br /><br />So, anyway, I finally got around to mashing this painting into a vision of the ultimate breakfast. And now I can ledditgo.Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-35413919367084269612010-03-10T23:12:00.000-08:002010-03-10T23:21:49.428-08:00Las Vegas Face & Body Painting ConventionSomeone posted a query about the best tips people learned at the convention.<br />Here are some ideas and gifts I can put forth...<br />• First and foremost, ask for what you want, and ask HOW you can get it. Amazing things happen that way.<br />• we all benefit when we positively support one another<br />• there is still enough work to go around if we MAKE IT HAPPEN<br />• Dive in! I was scared to jam. Teeth didn't chatter, but knees were weak and hands shook. The first night I sort of wandered around looking at what other people were doing, didn't even bring a kit. Silly me! Once I actually did bring my kit down and set myself up, painting felt joyful and safe again. I was just an artist among artists and that "I could never do that... hey I could do better than that" simultaneous crazy crappy thinking in my head just fell away.<br /><br />• Nothing ever happens the same way twice - especially with face painting! Every artist is a bit of a thief, and we can make every piece of art our own by being in the moment - "stealing" from one another, "stealing" from other art forms, "stealing" from our own life and dreams. It's not stealing at all, actually, it's just trying new things and growing - even if we learn it by copying others' design. Yes, be grateful, yes, acknowledge the gift... and make it your own by changing it to suit you. <span style="font-style: italic;">We really don't "own" ideas</span> (I stole that idea from the Wolfe bros, who stole it from Carl Jung or someone like him). To paraphrase Anne LaMott, "If you don't write your ideas down, God will give them to someone else." (On the other hand, even if you DO write your ideas down, someone else is doing the same thing half a world away - which is why Darwin and Marshall raced to publish about the theory of evolution, and we were treated to two movies about Truman Capote in one scintillating year, and why both the New World and the Old World had pyramids). I was so crushed at 19 when I found out that someone else had already coined the phrase "mental floss". Dang it, I was gonna be rich. It's not like we're printing out digital art as a giclee. The face is different, the skin color and texture, the relationship with the model, the weather, the light, the paint changes consistency, the Paint Gods decide you're gonna make a "mistake" that improves the design... and the Idea... it's a feather on the wind, going from mind to mind. All we can do is try to catch a whiff of it as it blows by. <br /><br />• best practical tip with paint (From Lucy Brouillard) - look at paint not only in terms of hue (red, blue, yellow, all colors in between). Look at it also in terms of its value on the grey scale. When she told me that, I realized my colors tended to look washed out because I had not selected enough really deep, saturated paints, so my designs, which are pretty enough, tended to look pastel and delicate - and were overwhelmed when I tried to add a bold, black line. I have a lot more to learn about this - but checking the value has really, really helped me.<br />• best thing I really hadn't thought of: grafitti-style names (Wizer). I had done a few blocks of text in a "puffy" style but nothing like his designs. This will definitely be popular with teens and young adults. <br />• it was so interesting to compare advice and comments between wildly diverse, incredibly talented and successful artists - leaders in this field. Some mix paints and brands blithely and have never encountered a problem. Some are fiercely brand-loyal. Some paint for almost nothing if they feel like painting and don't have another gig booked (and face it - they ARE PAINTING! Beats fishing any day of the week, as far as I'm concerned). Others don't even show up for less than $400 in a day. All different - all successful. Common traits:<br />• the ones who were MOST successful were the MOST generous. I have a feeling that generosity creates success... so <span style="font-style: italic;">don't wait till you're successful to be generous.</span><br />• everyone's insecure, even the best. but they don't let insecurity get in their way<br />• they don't copy anyone else's work line-for-line. They may have learned some technique, tips, and motifs from other face painters... but they are focused on creating, not duplicating.<br />• I saw so VERY VERY LITTLE rude or prima-donna behavior even when the situation wasn't perfect. (of course I probably missed a major tantrum or two, thank my lucky stars!) There were a lot of technical difficulties with this show. As an example, Wolf Reicherter from Germany wasn't given a proper black-light set up in time for a class - which theoretically should have been arranged for him well in advance - but he handled it with such grace and calm. I would have been in tears. And a bunch of people got bustling and helped him get a backdrop and posts set up for his lights. Wolf is a really nice man and my gosh, his art is FABULOUS. Unfortunately I discovered that black light gives me a searing headache - does anyone have any hints about how to deal with that? Because I could use a really hip-looking set of goggles.<br /><br />• The best way to learn how to do something is often to do it. Karen Owens and her crew worked their tails off (I think Karen slept about 2 hours between 2/7 and 2/10). What an amazing act of courage to pull this off (this goes for all of the conventions: I've done a little event coordination and there are SO many aspects to cover! ) But with ANY event there's a learning curve: bigger event = bigger curves - and no matter how hard you work, experience has something new to teach you. For anyone who was critical of the level of organization... remember there will be a day when you leave home without a crucial piece of equipment: phone, brushes, sponges, paints, clown nose, whatever. Ain't it great to be human?<br /><br />Las Vegas Face Painting Convention wasn't perfect (neither am I - had a few moments of grousing until someone very kindly reminded me to count my blessings). But if anyone walked away from that event thinking it wasn't worth it... if anyone sat in the back of the room or chitchatted while the instructors painted and explained so clearly... if anyone took no notes and expected to remember everything... if anyone thought there wasn't enough of ... whatever... well, no matter where ya go, there YOU are. For me the whole experience was a HUGE blessing. A huge PILE of blessings! I'm so grateful to all the incredibly kind people who helped me on my way, the instructors, the other students, and the event producers. I only wish I could have taken every class - had to make some very hard choices. In fact, if someone figures out a way to clone me so I can be two places at once, I'll give them backrubs every day for a year. Then the other me will give them footrubs. A win-win situation for the geneticist of my dreams. Oh, heck, maybe I'll just paint their kid.Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-36393330935452144412010-01-12T23:10:00.001-08:002010-01-12T23:14:11.377-08:00bloggity blog blog blogI'm an artist. On those days when I actually do art. But many days I avoid it. I'm trying to do the Julia Cameron "Artist's Way" exercises and frankly for me, writing comes easily but art comes hardly. Drawing now requires a discipline to DO, when it used to be so hard to tear myself away. I used to be able to just sit in front of the tv and draw for hours, but now my eyes have aged and focusing back and forth is awful. But glasses are very uncomfortable (amblyopia? crooked nose? both!) I should just start doing the books-on-tape thing.<br /><br />guess what. I am afraid to make yet another mess in my house. So I avoid art... because I should be cleaning. I'm going to get up right NOW and go draw something (ah, the lovely sound of hard rain on my aluminum back-porch awning).Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-87361395455973541542010-01-08T19:38:00.000-08:002010-01-08T19:53:01.968-08:00Rumination: The Princess Bride and My Favorite YearMy sweetie and I were watching My Favorite Year just now, and I noticed something interesting. There's a scene where Benjie and girlfriend KC are watching an Alan Swan movie and Swan's character, a Robin Hood type, says "As you wish". Then a swordfight ensues, ending in the death of the villain. As the Swan movie concludes, the hero and heroine kiss. The next shot is Benjie and girlfriend kissing. She says "I guess this is the kissing part of the date". <br /><br />Does this ring a bell to you? I'm not talking about plagiarism. I'm talking about monkeys washing yams - or possibly a subtle tribute, or a shared in-joke. I'm very curious.<br /><br />Here's something interesting: David Palladini's tarot deck, circa 1975. Isn't that Buttercup?Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-43953648904466048592009-08-28T14:59:00.000-07:002009-08-28T15:00:23.412-07:00Hating the sin, loving the hypocriteThis is scary to post because it's going to tick some people off, but here goes.<br /><br /> (I don't *want* to offend, but this is an issue I've had with many different religious orientations, not just Christianity. I hope you will hear me out and I trust that you will come to your own conclusions intelligently; my intention is to explain my own feelings with full knowledge that I will change nobody's mind).<br />First I should say that I do believe there is a god of some kind, and that I've rejected Catholicism, and I respect a lot of traditions and myths as necessary and beautiful - they foster family and social connections and can lead to spiritual growth and joy. I deeply believe in the Golden Rule (which shows up as a thread in most cultures). I feel that people should be allowed to practice their own religions in peace as long as<br />1) they harm no one (define harm? well... does it hurt? did you bleed? did you have a choice? Were you coerced?)<br />2) and do not try to impose their religions on others. Since some religions have conversion and population expansion built-in as part of the plan, this is a real problem for me, since our planet is imploding under the weight of our never-ending greed for resources).<br /><br />I think that everyone, even the most "fundamental" believer, picks and chooses what they will believe and what makes sense to them. The possible exception would be those few who are beaten or brainwashed into parroting whatever they are told. Whether they believe what they espouse is questionable. But they will, by the nature of their own abuse, turn around and abuse others, and blame it on their religion. Or they may reject the doctrine outright and go do something different, if they can escape alive.<br /><br />Religious texts contain varied and often conflicting information. This is how we get one group focusing on transubstantiation, one group focusing on converting others, one group focusing on the interpretation of individual letters / words / phrases / passages. Cast your seed on the ground or take multiple wives? Beat your wife and screw your slaves or follow the golden rule? Take an eye or turn the cheek? Did Jesus have blue eyes or brown, or did he even exist at all, and if so, was he an avatar or just a nice guy who got nailed to a board? Free choice, God's will, fate, or random acts? Do what you will - or harm no one? Is the wine sacred or profane? "Yes, God hates you, the Upanishads told me so. Now make your virgins plow naked in the moonlight for three nights and maybe I'll send you a rainstorm." This really happened. In India. This summer.<br />http://preview.tinyurl.com/mchy7a<br /> Damn right I'm judgmental about it. I bet somebody enjoyed the show, a few "useless" daughters got married off, and I'm sure that when rain comes (as someday it will) they'll congratulate themselves on a job well done.<br /><br />I think it's hypocritical to blame one's judgments on one's religion instead of taking responsibility for them. I think it's a way to pass the buck in favor of one's own unexamined fears and prejudices. We support this or we refute that, based not on what a book tells us or what a god tells us, but what we choose to believe will give us a better outcome (heaven, rain, true love, success in battle, parking spaces...).<br /><br />If it's God's will, why did God will that others would believe ideas diametrically opposed to our own? To make us more stalwart? In that case, do we choose to be more stalwart, or are we little Pavlovian dogs barking at infidels? Did God just decide that anyone who disagrees with us is accursed?<br /><br /> We say we can't help believing what we believe. If we have free will, don't we choose what we are looking for, what we focus on? Consciously, we pin our beliefs and ideas partially on whatever religion or faith or lack of it we have, but the truth is that it's backwards: we keep or drop a religious belief based on what feels right to us. So it *is* possible for me to be a hypocrite if I say "hate the sin but love the sinner" - when I am the one deciding what the sin is, not god. For instance: I like certain kinds of sex. In some cultures, it is considered sinful for people to have sex except for procreation. Sinful. Evil. I am a sinner. I also love the sin. In fact I don't think it's a sin at all (between consenting adult humans), and I bet 99.9% of the people reading this list don't either. But the gray areas of what I do with my own parts, and others' parts, make for a world of judgments. Sex is not a cardboard box, but many want to treat it that way: Slot A can only work with Tab B. Can slot A accept tab B instead of tab A? It might not be structurally practical, but in some cultures, that's a sin. Then we go to having two Slot A's in the same toolbox, being all slotty with each other. That's a really sinny sin. With regard to New Testament Christianity, the "sin" of homosexuality was never even mentioned in the gospels (unless it was removed; there was a lot snipped out - and believe me, if he'd spoken negatively about it, they would have left it in). Jesus obviously talked about a lot more than was recorded in the Gospels. If, in the thousands of words he must have said, he never even bothered to address it or make it an important talking point, maybe it's because in his infinite love and wisdom, it was a non-issue. Maybe he didn't care because homosexuality isn't a sin. Loving thy neighbor: good. Casting the first stone: sin. <br /><br /> If I commit "sins" according to a given doctrine, and expect to be accepted for it, while I simultaneously hold another perceived "sinner" in judgment simply for wanting to be who they are, that's not devout or unconditionally loving. That's hypocritical. I'm doing it right now, damn me, because I really don't want to be judgmental but I really am. I'm judgmental toward people who want to deprive others of the right to marry for love "because I'm a christian and homosexuality is a sin". I'm really mad that people use religion to "prove" they are on higher moral ground, when they're just using the religious equivalent of "because I said so" and hiding behind religion so people will "respect their beliefs". But I have no way to prove that my moral ground is actually higher than theirs. Which makes ME smug and self-righteous. What a mindfuck. oh, dear. I bet that's a sin in somebody's book. Mmm, nice slippery mind... where was I?<br /><br />Maybe humanity really is doomed. But, if God wanted to save humanity, wouldn't he send a bunch of really nice people who DON'T automatically make babies when they have sex?<br /><br />I know if I have to sit through anymore apocalyptic movie trailers I'm gonna just shoot myself. So I'm gonna go pretend the end is not near and have an ice cream cone. Just don't watch me lick it, that's a sin in some places.<br /><br />For what it's worth, it's my two - or three - bits.<br /><br />grins<br />AlanaAlana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-71149972243897366052009-08-19T16:17:00.000-07:002009-08-19T16:26:57.564-07:00Post-Vivum: notes on my first art show (Art Attack)I usually find that I learn better from experiences by writing about them -<br />so here are some notes from my first art show, and I hope others may find it of<br />help as they explore the joys and terrors of putting their hearts on their figurative<br />sleeves.<br /><br /> The art show went much better than I<br />expected; I think some people wandered out rolling their eye but<br />that's fine with me. It was too last-minute for most of my friends to<br />come, but one of my oldest friends was able to make it with her<br />family, so that was lovely. Overall I'd say about 30 guests came<br />through, including 2 kids. I made a few connections in terms of people<br />really looking at and liking my work, and got a possible professional<br />connection from a graphic artist who needs occasional illustration,<br />along with several folks interesting in face painting. I was surprised<br />at the mix of people: about 1/3 who were actually artists, 1/3 people<br />who were longing to do art but aren't able to, and 1/3 people who<br />called themselves art-lovers but were non-artists (I asked). Don't<br />know what that means but I found it very interesting. It was so nice<br />to be able to say "If I can do it, you can!" Got to paint a beautiful<br />percussionist/artist with gorgeous skin and bone structure and<br />copper-colored hair. That was really satisfying.<br /><br />I need to organize better (of course!) in terms of: unfinished stuff,<br />finished stuff, "fine art" (definition up for debate), illustration,<br />and cartooning (I do a lot of stuff with ironic, visual pun, or<br />editorial content although I rarely <span class="il">post</span> them). And here's the bugaboo:<br />framing. I hate framing, I hate frames, I hate mattes - unless they are<br />an integral part of the art. I need to look at why, but I haven't yet.<br /><br />Notes to self:<br />• Do not buy or serve cheap italian wine if you can't read the<br />bottle. The bottle is a pretty blue glass,<br />but the "dry white" wine was some sort of sparkling thing.<br />Apparently it was pretty vile.<br />Happy to say I didn't even think of trying it.<br />• Buy less cheese (originally I had thought of doing fondue, but<br />Charlie has been to a lot more gallery openings than me and said -<br />kindly omitting his first though which was probably ARE YOU OUT OF<br />YOUR MIND??? - "You're going to drive yourself crazy maintaining that<br />and cheese goo is going to get everywhere. Just get some cheese and<br />slice it up." Wise, wise man! We went with sliced cheese and<br />sourdough, it was fine. I got compliments on my fine taste in<br />schnackies. Trader Joe's ROCKS.<br />• I found it helpful for my own nervousness to talk up the place and<br />the studio rather than my art. Charlie thought I need to talk up my<br />art more, but I'm not there yet - it was hard for me to verbally be<br />accepting of my art where it is, and that starts to sound like<br />excuses. That's my ego in the middle of it all (I need to do more<br />writing and meditation about the nature of pride and ego in creating<br />art and sharing art... ooh, I've never really done much in the way of<br />artshares aside from classroom critiques. Wish we had an ARTS meeting<br />around here). I did have one nice discussion about a piece that<br />really made itself; a lady admired it and I said without thinking<br />"Isn't that cool? It had me up all night, giggling, while I did it."<br />She lit up and nodded, so she'd clearly been there herself. It's not<br />about pride although I guess it might look like pride. Those pieces<br />are treasures because they come from a place of mystery, we just try<br />to get out of their way and watch them unfold.<br />• Wear my knee brace and supportive shoes! I spent a lot of time on<br />my feet today and my leg is *REALLY* hurting me!<br /><br />Overall, I feel I accomplished what I needed to do - putting myself<br />out there, warts and all. If this inspired a couple of artists, and if<br />a few people got that I have something to offer as an artist, that is<br />a huge gift.<br /><br />Funny, a week or so ago I asked for a change, and for things<br />to start shaking loose. Then the car broke down and the cat died, and I got the last-minute OK to open the studio for this show. <br />That scared me (a lot, actually), but I've also had some<br />extraordinarily good things happen too, by trying to create forward<br />momentum. I don't know where it will all take me, if anywhere, but<br />it's an interesting journey. Minko!Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-39212866939534951092009-07-24T12:05:00.001-07:002009-07-24T12:08:36.649-07:00Political Kryptonite: Repealing Prop 13This letter was written to Credo in response to their offer of "Repeal Prop 13" bumper stickers.<br />***<br />The machine behind 13 is too strong, and the propaganda is too inflammatory. Prop 13 reform is considered Kryptonite for politicians. The minute anyone tries to even suggest repealing, we start seeing ads about old ladies being thrown out of their homes because they can't pay the property taxes.The Jarvis-Gann groups are experts at fearmongering and they ruthlessly destroy any chance, because they are greedy beyond imagining. <br /><br />This is what needs to be hammered home to California voters: Some aspects of Prop 13 CAN be revised to benefit Californians and businesses. If we sell those benefits, I think reformation CAN be pushed through. If we go negative, we will get NOWHERE. At ALL. We must offer not only repair of crumbling schools, public services, and highways: we must offer real improvement, and treat this money carefully as a prudent investment in the future, not merely as an onerous expense. So, constantly frame it as a *benefit*, and have arguments tailored to overcome opposition. It's very easy to preach to the Credo-oriented convert; help give us real talking points for those who need to be convinced.<br /><br />Here are some thoughts - and keep in mind I'm a layperson, no lawyer, economist, or expert of any kind except how to eat ramen 6 days a week and not get thoroughly sick of it:<br /><br />• those who inherit their parents' homes could be "grandfathered in" but still pay reasonable property taxes based on the home's current market value, perhaps ramping up in increments or mitigated by the other items factored into the estate tax.<br />• CORPORATIONS and COMMERCIAL PROPERTY owners should be required to pay property taxes based on their property's current value, not on what they paid before Prop 13. This should be based on square usable footage, not on the parcel. It could be mitigated by credits such as green building, green / water saving open space, alternative energy usage, etc.<br />• Corporations who rely heavily on California infrastructure - or who are heavy polluters - construction, beverage bottlers, oil producers, container shipping, trucking, airlines, chemical manufacturers, etc. - should pay a fair property tax and have an itty-bitty .05% or something tacked on to help repair and replenish the infrastructure and environment they damage.<br />• Out-of-state and foreign property holders should see a slightly higher tax rate, because they are using the infrastructure and benefiting from CA consumers and tax payers without contributing... the money is basically being siphoned away never to be seen again.<br /><br />I think taxes that support our infrastructure should be fair - of course little old ladies should be able to keep their homes, and of course those with big expensive properties and pavement-crushing vehicles should be paying their *fair* share. Not all of it. Just a *fair* share. This won't drive any businesses out of CA and if they are sold on it correctly, they can then play the old "giving back to the community" card.... <br /><br />If trucking companies are paying taxes into a highway repair fund, and their repairs decrease because the roads don't suck, and their insurance rates go down because they have fewer accidents, who loses?<br /><br />I hope these ideas are helpful in formatting the campaign. I just don't see "REPEAL PROP 13" succeeding. You have to offer something better.Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-88829576904603830932009-07-15T09:02:00.000-07:002009-07-15T09:54:08.915-07:00We Are All Agents of the MiraculousWhat if that were true? What if the supernatural - meaning above the natural laws we can *currently* perceive and measure scientifically - was a reality? For instance, long ago we used willow bark to cure headaches, and were probably grateful to the spirit of the tree for soothing us, and I sure wonder a) WHY the willow bark has that chemical in it and b) HOW we found out that it works in the first place? Did someone boil water in willow basket and have their headache "miraculously" cured? Now we know it's a chemical; we isolate, synthesize, manufacture, package, distribute, advertise... But - isn't that ability so fantastically improbable as to be almost a miracle? Where does science end and miracle begin? Where does that leave the admirable work of people like Richard Dawkins, Penn & Teller, and other debunkers of the paranormal? <br /><br />Well... I don't think they're fools, or if they are, they're wise fools. Humanity has an enormous capacity for self-deception, and certainly many religions, myths, and charlatans have cause much more damage than good. I think their work is really important, because they skewer the wishful thinking and intellectual laziness that makes not only for bad science, but bad religion.<br /><br />That being said, disparaging belief and believers actually sets the atheists back in their message; nobody responds well to rudeness, and that rudeness is based on emotion, not logic. People shrink when they are shamed. Their minds expand when their curiosity is encouraged. I understand the atheists' frustration with smart people who go only so far with logic then seemingly turn it off when they get into the realm of faith. I wonder if they would learn something if, instead of insisting they were right, were to look into the physiological and emotional function of faith in human health and effectiveness. Truth is, most of the smartest and most effective people I know (and I know plenty of them) have spiritual sides. And some of the most messed-up are the skeptics.<br /><br />I'd rather hang out with Thich Nhat Hanh than Penn Gilette, who wears on me after about 20 minutes. I'd rather hang out with the Dalai Lama than Richard Dawkins anyday. But the atheists are doing something wonderful, and important: causing people to really examine WHY they believe, and what they believe, and perhaps turn them to positive action rather than the passivity of sitting there waiting for their prayers to fix their lives. Faith without works really IS dead. I read online somewhere that "prayer is a way of feeling like you're being helpful without actually having to DO anything". Ooh, that one STINGS.<br /><br />I know that, in terms of philosophy, of numbers, of science, there is an objective truth. One is one and all are all and evermore shall be-oh. And then there's zero, which is only an idea, because even the concept of zero is more than nothing. I also look at fractals, with their twisting permutations of the same motifs, and I see that the truth may be something between the supernatural and the super-mundane. Our search for the truth will necessarily be limited by our perceptions and our ability to process them, our language for what we experience, and our ability to measure. For instance, one man's "evil spirit in the cave" is another man's uranium mine. We barely know how to measure ANYTHING. We only figured out how big an atom is 75+- years ago. What if we are evolving our ability to perceive and measure, that so that the universe can experience itself? <br /><br />It seems to me that the fact life DOES evolve, and that curiosity has been a part of our evolution, may be a teeny-fractal expression of universal desire to know itself. It is also possible that true faith is an expression of curiosity about the next phase of our development as a species; our brains doing a slow cellular-level nudge toward abilities that transcend our current limitations. It could be that, since our skulls are getting too big to pass through the birth canal, the combination of medical birth assistance and bionic tools such as memory chips and sensory-enhancing implants will actually allow us to manufacture our evolution to a higher level, rather than relying on genetics to do it for us. The trick is to avoid a class system where only the rich access the tools. Another question: when we rely too much on a given technology, we atrophy the area that the technology assists - which is why I have the memory and attention span of a goldfish, and I can't sit on the floor without my hip seizing up.<br /><br />I can't honestly claim that I've ever accessed a universal mind. But when I diligently try to, my life seems to just work better. I get out of my own way, am happier, more prosperous, more effective. I'm not sitting around expounding on how stupid people are to believe in things.<br />So the hell with skepticism. I'm going to to a scientific experiment: I'm going to look for wonderfulness in the world, and I'll bet you that the more I look for the more I will find. I'll believe in something. Believe in peace, believe in g/d/s, believe in evolution's power to weed out the ineffective, believe in myself. And in those moments when things look like doom and I just can't, I'm going to make every effort to believe that I can make something better just by acting on faith.<br /><br />I think skepticism IS healthy... if you're also skeptical about your own skepticism. What if you're wrong? "What if..." has to be the greatest agent of change in the history of humanity. What if you let yourself believe in a power greater than yourself - would it change what you focus on, how you behave, how you feel about others, the trajectory of your life's progress? If you don't believe you are an agent of the miraculous... what can you do to make it so?Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-36426033278541496802009-06-28T02:31:00.000-07:002009-06-28T02:32:24.850-07:00Happy Birthday, Aisling!I don't know where you are, but I love you and miss you. I hope you are well, happy and safe.<br /><br />Google me, I'm easy to email through my other web site.<br /><br />Love<br />AlanaAlana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-91442697491587448042009-05-12T13:33:00.000-07:002009-05-12T14:42:23.038-07:00Those things down there, those people over there...(continued from OtisPTA post 5/16/09)<br /> I had a friend whose mother found out she was gay, beat her with a hairbrush, and threw her out of the house. My mom took her in and she stayed with us for months at a time. I think my dad guessed - he went on a regular dinner-table rant about those awful homosexuals he saw downtown in SF when he was at work, and she would just sit there, quiet as a mouse, trying to disappear. I didn't know she was gay - only her succession of "roommates" did. When she finally told me, I didn't really understand what it meant; I didn't have the means to really support her; I wish now that I'd said "I love you and I'm proud of who you are and I'm glad your my friend" instead of "oh! That explains a lot" without having a clue what it explained. She went through a series of disastrous relationships trying to fit in. She bounced in and out of the military, mental hospitals, a bad marriage to a straight man, prescription drug abuse, and severe depression; eventually we fell out of contact. I wonder what her life would have been like if her mother had understood she was born that way and had a right to happiness. Several of my other friends have married people who came out of the closet after years of marriage based on a lie. Love might have been there, but it wasn't enough; and everyone suffered. Is it necessary to raise more generations of people who must lie to fit in, or even survive?<br /><br />It's very important this curriculum is about relationships, not about the mechanics of sex. Thinking back to my own prurient (or at least precocious) little self, I was looking up the f-word in the dictionary at age 8 or 9. Unfortunately it was missing out of the Webster's New School Abridged 1962 edition in our school library. If my parents had just explained the basic plumbing and functions, it actually would have put the whole question to rest. It's sad they were able to explain how my nose worked, but taught me to mistrust and fear my own - um, things down there. So instead, I learned about "doing it" from another kid. Who had learned it from a friend at age 6... and his definition and vocabulary were not only lurid but inaccurate. This led to all sorts of confusion, embarrassment, and misapprehension.<br /><br />This curriculum hardly touches on sex and doesn't need to go much further than in discussion about a conventional nuclear family; something along the lines of "when two people love each other very much, they choose to create a family." And when you go into the biomechanics of it - whether you approve of it or not, it's basically science and kids will only absorb what they are ready for. "Doctors combine genetic material to make a complete baby, which then grows safely in a mommy's uterus until it's ready to be born. "<br /><br />As I told the City Council - I don't approve of the British Royal Family's doings. I don't believe in the Divine Right of Kings. I hate the idea of arranged and loveless marriages. I think the Prince of Wales dresses funny. But I acknowledge that they exist and are a cultural force to be aware of, and they are different but have their own quirky charm, funny hats and all. They may be one weird family, but they have a right to be themselves, and on a Social Studies level, my daughter needs to know about them.<br /><br /> She has been acquainted with, and been curious about, several gay couples and families; I remind her that love is a gift, and that people should be allowed to decide for themselves whom they will love, and whether they will start a family. She has occasionally noticed men in dresses or women in suits, and had friends who liked to dress a little differently; and I remind her how she'd feel if she were only allowed to wear dresses, or only pants, or only green, or never pink. Her world is a bigger, richer, and more interesting place with no harm done. God save the queens!Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-67816511717737568892009-04-29T09:00:00.000-07:002009-04-29T09:03:25.784-07:00Curriculum of compassionIn Japan they stress conformity with almost a pathological strictness; they have a saying "the nail that stands out will be hammered down". In the animal world, predators look for the standout weakling - the old, the young, the lame or sick - to cull. But we are evolving beyond our animal nature and it is the "different" people - the smart, the compassionate, the gentle, the dreamer - who will save us from ourselves. Being warriors, grunts and conformists has served us reasonably well for several million years, but now we're strong enough and big enough to have fouled our own nest. Humanity ain't gonna fly unless we start acting with clear, rational thought, not herd mentality. This means that the nonconformists - the meek - shall indeed inherit the earth. We can start by giving them the respect they deserve, and teaching our children it's wrong to bully those who are different. <br /><br />I'm weird and I'm proud. Get used to it.Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-322150674110493612009-04-05T00:12:00.000-07:002009-04-05T00:13:20.016-07:00Fascism, Free Press, and Digital NewsI am sometimes struck with the realization that, if our "press" dies and information is all relegated to the digital realm, and our freedom of the press is what keeps government honest, then fascism will have a huge advantage if it owns all the power sources. Also if all our art becomes digital art, and the plug is pulled....<br /><br />BRING ME MY PEN!!!Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-39743395571732020732009-04-02T13:08:00.000-07:002009-04-02T13:10:28.045-07:00Success of the Imagination: Funding art in schoolsAdapted from a letter I emailed to our new secretary of education.<br />***<br /><br />The US Government's lack of preparation against the Sept. 11 attacked was made possible by what the Commission called "a failure of the imagination." A lack of access to creativity in our younger generation will lead to negative consequences: social disconnection, low graduation rates, underemployment, and a myriad of unknown roads left untraveled, brilliant ideas unrealized, beautiful realities left fallow. Failure of the imagination on a massive scale. I propose you take this moment to foster the success of the imagination.<br /><br />I am an actively volunteeering elementary-school parent in Alameda, CA. Our budget has been cut repeatedly, like that of other districts. Alameda is one of the districts suffering doubly because, when our military based closed, we lost Federal funding. This funding has never been made up by the State of California. Add the un-funded testing pressure and draconian mandates of the ridiculous of No Child Left Behind... and most of our children ARE being left behind in an essential way: exposure to and practice of creativity. Although my concerns lie primarily with my home district, I realize this is a statewide problem; we teach the rote and expect a problem-solver. We teach to the test and expect a thinker. As first graders struggle under the thumb of pre-algebra, and fourth-graders are impaled nightly on the shiny pin of 5-page sociology reports, we neglect the very thing that makes school bearable: avenues to explore creativity, expression, and new ideas. Having presented the problem, I'd love to be part of offering a solution: an urgent request that you make a priority to fund arts education in all schools.<br /><br />My daughter's school, Otis Elementary, has a very active PTA. One of our best efforts is the Art Docent program, where parents come into the classroom and impart lessons to the children about art history and world culture. Children are guided into their own interpretation of the medium, and make their own message. In my 5 years as a docent, I've had many children light up when they see me, clamoring: "are we doing art today?". I've had kids who are not allowed to "make a mess" at home show true joy and enthusiasm and pride in their amazing creations. I've seen kids shine who are frequently seen as trouble-makers or struggle with poor academic achievement. Since different kids have different learning styles, these small successes can help turn things around.<br /><br />My PTA is not the norm. A number of schools in our district have no art docent program; no art at all aside from "cut out the blue square, paste near the red triangle". Supplies are limited; there is no exposure to different art forms and cultures; there is minimal creativity, there is not much of anything that would make a kid want to show up to school every day. And it's primarily an issue of funding: poor parents, no PTA funding, underserved students. I'm sure that, outside of our district, the same line of demarcation falls: kids of the working poor get the short end of the stick (or the dry end of the paintbrush). Their parents have no time to volunteer and may have language and educational barriers to helping out. Their parents may not have much understanding of art, and they may not value the creative thinking and problem-solving that art brings to the intellectual table. Their parents may even fear (like my Irish immigrant parents did) that studying art, music, theater, or dance means setting yourself up for a life of poverty. But in a culture that values the arts, a lucrative career is possible - at times in the animation industry, I've made more money per year than my father - an insurance sales executive. Ever single item you see around you was created, sold, and packaged by someone. Every movie you watch, every note you listen to, every book you read... artistic products. The arts fuel our economy; yet we give our children little training in artistic expression. We have no idea what these kids could do, because they barely have access to the concepts, let alone the materials.<br /><br />I think that these under-served, frustrated kids deserve better. In these economic times I know it's hard to get funding for the arts, but with creative thinking, unexpected avenues open: teaching artists will often work for a reasonable stipend, materials can be donated, parents can be mentored to help not only their own children but those who share their classrooms and neighborhoods; teachers can access tools and support to easily integrate arts education with relevant curriculum. <br /><br />If you fund the arts in schools, everyone wins. If you don't, everyone loses. Please use your own mind creatively, and give arts funding a high priority in the educational budget.Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-21354373218422143702009-02-20T08:40:00.000-08:002009-02-20T09:07:25.040-08:00Artist Manifesto - draft 3 of 3,529Become the art you wish to see in the world.<br /><br />I call for the elevation of kitsch and the worship - or at least close rapturous scrutiny - of false idols with a grain of truth inside. How do events conspire to make the world the way it is? Does the art we make actually contribute to the motions of culture? Of course it does. In that case, by G/d/s, I am going to paint sleeping babies and people kissing passionately. And puppies playing "go fish".<br /><br />Your list of "25 random things about me" is not random at all. What are the 1000 things you left out? They're no more random - unless EVERYTHING is random, and if that were the case, *nothing* would be predictable. Acts, events, and choices may be surprising to someone who doesn't know the full picture, but that is completely different from actual randomness or coincidence. Predictability is a tool of science, but it's the proof of order. Can there be order without mind? Does order matter? Does mind matter? Does matter matter? It's all or nothing, baby.<br /><br />What if there is no why? That doesn't make sense, there's always cause and effect. Or is there? discuss amongst yourselves.Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-76245397036145201362009-02-08T23:57:00.000-08:002009-02-09T00:02:42.809-08:00Inauguration, Prognostication, Intuition, InformationI am going through old unread email digests and found some posts about the inauguration. I don't think I weighed in. <br /><br />Charlie and I went down to the local library where the local League of Women Voters and Friends of the Library pooled their resources and had a live broadcast of the inauguration. There were 250 people in the room watching 2 large-screen TVs. Kleenex were passed. I broke into tears several times. It was SO nice to be with a community of excited, hopeful people instead of holed up in the living room.<br /><br />I am a good prognosticator, though I go almost purely by simple intuition. When Ronald Raygun proudly started turning us toward a "service" economy, I wondered how much the servants of the servants would make.My friends shrugged and said "ok, whatever". When Kindergarten Cop came out, I predicted that Arnold S would run for governor. My friends laughed. I hate to tell you how I feel about living in a flood plane between two of the most active and dangerous earthquake faults in the world. If it were my decision, I'd sell the house and move to Oregon tomorrow (yes: volcanos. I know. But I prefer rain to drought). As for our new president, Mistakes Will Be Made. Sheesh, mistakes have <span style="font-style: italic;">already</span> been made. But it's not a party until a glass of punch gets spilled. Mistakes are part of the process... even W made a few. Ok, he double-dipped in the guacamole of life. I will not miss him.<br /><br />This is my prognostication: things are going to suck for a while, and then they are going to slowly get better. I think we really are reaching a paradigm shift - for now, the pendulum swings away from greed and toward conscientiousness. We in the information age are having trouble figuring out what to do with all those facts, figures, and ideas; how to apply it all toward the highest good, how to be really useful in the world, but we're learning. Intellectually, we're still teenagers; our brains haven't finished growing yet. (look it up)<br /><br />Personally, things are kinda sucking for me, but I'm hoping for change, and willing to work toward it, and I'm grateful for what I have, including a president with brains and, it appears, moral strength.Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-16064159241054338372009-02-08T22:49:00.000-08:002009-02-08T23:07:48.043-08:00The Slippery Slope of FascismBuckle up your crampons, folks, it's gonna be a <span class="nfakPe">slippery</span> night!<br />;-)<br /><br />This was written in response to a question my buddy Michael B posed on a group list. I have seen and heard it before, so it seems worth addressing:<br /><br /><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Q</span>:</span> <span style="font-style: italic;">If we change the definition {of marriage} for this group {homosexuals}, how do you or under what </span><span style="font-style: italic;">reasoning can you tell the next group that it can't be changed to suit their want.</span><br /><br />***<br /><span style="font-size:130%;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">A:</span></span> Note: I've stayed almost completely out of the political discussion this year because of a tendency in the past for mean-spirited commentary to arise. I will do my best to give my perspective on your legitimate question. Take what you like, and leave the rest.<br /><br />Our dear founding fathers were radicals, not traditionalists. Perhaps if they'd known more about the future they would have thrown in more Biblical stuff, but they didn't. They said "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness". Well... without freedom, there is no happiness. These were people who stood up to the Divine Right of Kings. Gay marriage was just a matter of time. <span class="nfakPe">There's your slippery slope</span>; freedom begets freedom. We have a sweet, but dying, tradition of asking the bride's dad for her hand in marriage. A sentimental gesture now, but that used to be pretty much the rule of law. So it goes with traditions; some we keep, and some change or fall away.<br /><br />Michael, your query is known as a "<span class="nfakPe">slippery</span> slope" argument. It would be used validly if the slope were, indeed, <span class="nfakPe">slippery</span>. However the slope is more of a little hill than a steep cliff - it's shaped more like a bell curve. What you call "want" is, for others, "need", as much as you "need" to be with the woman of your dreams and would be utterly miserable without a soul mate, so do most people have these feelings. Thank goodness they don't all want to be with <span style="font-style: italic;">your wife</span>! That saying "to each his own" is so profoundly wise. The "ah, I'm home" feeling is spread out demographically, not in a line graph with "very straight" at one end to "very gay" at the other. Instead, the spread of sexual proclivity resembles the "liberal/conservative" diagram someone presented a while back, where based on one's answers folks placed on a 2-d plane (I seem to remember it was social conservative/fiscal liberal and permutations thereof). Only in this case, it's 3D, like a little hill. Based on population distribution, in the outer and lower slope (purely by weight of numbers, no moral judgment intended) are the people who are strictly homosexual. Somewhere toward the middle are people who are (admitted or not) bisexual to some level - all <span style="font-style: italic;">cultural</span> pressures aside, they'd probably go for whomever they found attractive (which is why some friends feel it necessary to remind us "always make sure it's a woman!"). And in the big round central hump are the folks who are mostly or completely heterosexual. There's another slope off on another face of the hill somewhere that has people with little or no sex drive. Since that's not much of an advantage in terms of evolution, and is probably related to chemical imbalances or depression, i think it's safe to leave it out for our purposes here. Although there are certainly people who are pressured into having sex they don't want, there are already (thankfully) laws against it (even though it made huge headlines about 30 years ago when a woman successfully had her husband prosecuted for rape for the first time in this country). Anyway, far far out on the fringes are folks who want to marry their goats, or their mothers, or whatever. We'll call that a pretty steep dropoff to zero. And we can build a fence right where the slope is about to drop off, by simply limiting marriage to "consenting adult humans who will harm no one directly by marrying".* <br /><br />The definition of "harm" is going to be argued. But think about the perception of harm in different societies. In the 1800's, a young woman who kissed without being betrothed was considered a trollop. A woman without a husband was at the bottom of society - so many people were forced into marriages to avoid "harm". And in that social context, perhaps that was best. But it's not best anymore, because now our society allows women to work outside the home. Pursuing, it would be hoped, happiness and liberty. Right now in certain countries, a woman is not allowed to go anywhere before marriage without her husband or father to keep her in line; there is no pursuit of happiness for her, simply acceptance of her lot no matter how bitter. I read just today about a 17-year-old slave who was raped by her master and is now shunned by her family because her baby was born out of wedlock (and her name is not Hester Prynne or Tess Derbyfield). That's their culture, rooted in ancient tradition, but it's not generally accepted in American culture now. And not so long ago in these here United States, interracial marriage was illegal. Is it right for the mainstream to shun and castigate those who wish to follow their hearts' desires? Wouldn't we be wiser to err on the side of protecting personal freedom than forcing conformity?<br /><br />Sex is about more than procreation. Marriage is about more than sex. They are both about social contracts - as short as a 20-minute makeout session, as long as a lifetime. At their best they provide intimacy and joy, everyone shares their needs and gets some satisfaction through one compromising position or another ;-). At their worst, they are a hellish trap. And then there's the bell curve in between - (sex that could use some modification, marriages that could use some help, but it's all basically ok). Marriage is not primarily for procreation any more; many who have children do it well outside of marriage, many marry long after childbearing age is over, many never have kids but stay together because they love each other. <br />So, here are some questions, and I'm not asking them with sarcasm but with real fear of where society can go if we start reverting to repressive actions. If homosexual marriage is a threat:<br />-->Does this mean old retired people who marry are a threat to marriage?<br />-->Do those who are childless - by choice or not - defy the acceptable definition of marriage?<br />-->Is YOUR marriage valid if you're not going forth to multiply as the Bible tells its followers to do?<br />-->If a person strongly desires a family - and you know that "family" is more than a sex partner, it's a sense of being "home" and really belonging - must that family be denied them?<br />-->If a gay person lies about their sexual orientation to please society, doesn't that harm their partner? is that marriage sanctified by G/d?<br />-->Should gay men marry only gay women? How does that honor G/d? <br />-->Should we take back the sodomy laws that were thrown out in 2003? Personally, I'd be very sad never to have oral sex again, but if it's illegal... oh well. I shall have to accept the inevitable knock on the door.<br />-->If unmarried people cannot adopt, and there are thousands of gay adults longing for children, and there are thousands of unwanted children longing for families, whom does it serve when these people are denied families? Because a civil union doesn't count as a marriage, children in Arkansas are - right now - facing the loss of their adoptive parents. Are foster homes and shelters better for these children than stable and loving parents?<br /><br />Here is the <span class="nfakPe">slippery</span> slope you need to really fear, Michael: the slope of religion-based fascism. I believe in G'd and there's many ways to find them/him/her it, but there are plenty of sects out there who are dead certain there's only ONE way, and literally to hell with everyone else. If our church and state do not remain separate, sooner or later one group of "true believers" will succeed in what they've been trying to do all along - take control of people's private lives. If you value the right to marry whom you please, if you consider that a civil right, how can you deny that civil right to other consenting adults? That's what Prop 8's supporters just did - the Mormon church (which was once ostracized because of polygamous activities) were a huge funder for the Yes on 8 campaign because hey, they are self-elected to call the moral shots. And they are a tax-exempt entity because they are a church - even though they are incredibly powerful political lobbyists. Next, they can turn around and say you aren't married because you're not planning a family. Or damn you because maybe you once had a girlfriend who terminated a pregnancy, or you got caught with condoms or a vibrator or have a vascectomy on your medical records. . Or because you're of Italian extraction and your wife is of (___fill in the blank___) heritage and that wasn't written on Moron the Angel's golden tuba, or whatever. There's your <span class="nfakPe">slippery</span> slope. Gay brides and bridegrooms are the very least of your worries. If you really can't dredge up any compassion for those who want the right to marry whom they love, try dredging up a little self-preserving indignation, because someone is going to be regulating <span style="font-style: italic;">you</span> next. I wonder when you'll decide to fight back?<br /><br />*it will also be very interesting if we ever encounter hot sexy aliens - can we marry them even if we can't procreate with them? Oh, only if they're not gay. Dang.Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2239309676354496706.post-31718130455795112802008-08-10T00:50:00.000-07:002008-08-10T00:56:50.656-07:00Kitsch, Art, EvilI read somewhere recently that kitsch is evil. My understanding was that the author hated prettified things. To a small extent, I agree - especially when it involves the cutification of sex. Like Bratz dolls. I've also noticed that artists over time have presented all kinds of sexual situations - including S&M and other non-mainstream - by couching them in either Biblical or other mythological contexts. Like, these people are kissing, but the guy has wings, so it's ok. It's outside the realm of reality.<br /><br />But I really hate plain stuff that looks as if it was made by a machine. This is a bit embarrassing, but I'd rather have a cheesy thing that's made by machine but looks handmade, than a handmade thing that's so perfect it looks machine made. Especially if it's uncomfortable. Case in point, that darling of modernism, the Eames chair. Bleh. I don't care if it has great lines, it hurts my back and it looks so--- inhuman.Alana Dillhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13087231337381347438noreply@blogger.com0